Execution of the Value Stream Analysis 4 by Space Dreamer -10-

Author : M.Temel AYGUN

Starting the project & defining added value

Before the start of the project, the product or product family is determined, which is going to be analyzed. A product family is a group of products that occupies the same or similar resources in production and order processing. The VSA 4.0 is carried out for the entire order processing process. Therefore, the project team must also be assembled cross-departmentally. Employees from marketing, sales and adjustment development should especially be integrated.

At the beginning it should be clarified which product characteristics are especially important for customers and how they are created today. This helps refine one’s awareness for non-value-adding activities in the VSA. At the same time it is to define, what the value stream has to accomplish in the future in order to establish a striving competitive advantage (e.g. “…we deliver faster than…”, “…free product configuration…”) and to realize the planned business model. Then a clear target should be set by management which KPIs should be improved for the selected product group (e.g. reduce order throughput time to X days, reduce First Time Failure Rate to Y ppm, etc.) to achieve the desired competitive advantage. This makes it easier for the project team to prioritize improvement opportunities. In this way, improvement ideas can already be thought up by the team during the analysis phase to shape the future state vision.

Analyze the current state –  Value Stream Analysis 4.0

The traditional VSA initially creates an overarching understanding of the value stream for all involved. The result is a value stream representation with visualized areas of potential, the  Kaizen flashes. The familiar process boxes from the VSA are first extended upon in the VSA 4.0 in such a way that the collected information sources can be represented in extended notation. The type of data collection is characterized by the collection interval and its type of recording. At the same time, the respective current value is determined and inscribed in the process box. This notation should be used as uniformly as possible across all processes.

Understanding and incorporating storage media for information

To make the handling of data and information transparent, horizontal lines for each used storage medium are now delineated on the value stream map below the process boxes. Examples of storage media are paper, ERP systems, MES or MS Excel®, as well as the employees themselves. Next step is the analysis and representation of the information flows from the sources to the storage media. Therefore, information sources are affiliated with the associated storage media through vertical lines and nodal points.   

Analyzing the use of information

Subsequently, there is a review of which applications the collected information is used for, e.g. in quality management, for order control, or for shop floor management. For every type of usage, just like for storage media, horizontal lines are inscribed. Information sources, in turn, are subsequently affiliated with the applications through vertical (in this case, dashed) lines and points. Here it already becomes evident as to which collected information will not be used or will be used differently than intended.    

Recording wastes in information logistics In this step, the already introduced wastes in information logistics are recorded for all processes and inscribed as Kaizen flashes. Furthermore, the observed level of waste in dealing with information can be quantified by means of figures. As an example, here three figures are specified:

  • Data availability: It answers the question what percentage of necessary information/figures is actually being recorded.
  • Data usage: It shows what percentage of the recorded information sources is actually subsequently used.
  • Digitalization rate: It discloses what percentage of the recorded information sources is digitally recorded.

These figures can be calculated for a single workstation, a line or the entire order throughput.

Example application of VSA 4.0

The example shows a portion of the value stream of a special machine manufacturer, which extends from customer contact all the way to production (Fig. 17). Though products are individually adjusted in size and material depending on the customer’s application the order-specific information processing (customer clarification, adaptation of drawing, CNC programming) is basically the same for every customer project. The programming time for an order amounts to approx. 30 minutes and ultimately represents an implementation of the customer’s desired product parameters in a CNC code.

The following wastes arise from the traditional value stream analysis:

  • Frequent questions from construction to sales
  • Machine downtime during programming
  • Rejects due to programming errors

The application of VSA 4.0 provides further insights:

  • To exchange data and information, twelve different storage media are necessary (number of horizontal lines).
  • The high number of nodal points on the vertical lines of the data exchange indicates that process steps use several storage media for the same information.

Additional wastes arise from this, e.g.:

  • Employees must transmit information from different systems and with different formats by hand.
  • Media disruptions hinder the smooth flow of information and extend the processing time.

The figures confirm the findings and demonstrate additional potential for improvement: 

  • The data availability of the key performance indicators desired by management, such as processing time, quantity, etc. is 0 % for all processes.
  • None of the recorded information is being used in order to push forward an improvement of the value stream (undermost horizontal line). The data usage figure is therefore 0 %.
  • The digitalization rate in the value stream is  0 %, since paper is the storage medium used in different forms for every exchange of information.

Quick order processing through the synchronization of information flows

The traditional VSD aims to reduce the throughput time of a product by eliminating non-valueadding activities. Information is considered mainly from the process control perspective. This doesn’t sufficiently take into account the comprehensive, new opportunities for the use of information through digitalization and networking. Companies in mechanical engineering must consider further information flows beside the information for process control in order to be able to supply customers quickly and flexibly, improve processes, and increase the customer value through information-based services. Four information flows can be recognized that must mesh together in synchronization:

The product flow represents the physical flow of material. In production, this coincides with the product information flow (see below), partly from the flow of suppliers.

The utilities flow controls the provision and transport of necessary operating and auxiliary materials for the execution of an order.

The process information flow comprises information about the condition of production and all supporting processes (like processing time, force, temperature, pressure, etc.).

The product information flow comprises all information about the product. It begins with the customer but leads through development (e.g. drafting of drawing) and work preparation (e.g. programs, work plans) all the way to logistics, production and to the customer.

If one of the four information flows comes to a halt or is not synchronized with the other flows, delays can result due to waiting times. In order to avoid this, a synchronization of these information flows should be ensured. This is especially demanding in production, as all four flows encounter one another here. At a workstation, the work and testing instructions must be available at the same time as the physical product, the tools, fixtures and measurement devices, and the necessary process parameters configured. In addition, the customer is to be linked to the in-house information flows in order to accelerate order clarification, adaptation development and work preparation, but also to receive product information from the usage phase.  

See you in next blog with the following topics :

  • Determining the target condition –  Value Stream Design 4.0
  • Digitally improving product flow
  • The new process in detail

07.06.2020

Kadıköy, İstanbul – TURKEY

M. Temel AYGÜN, Ph. D. in Aerospace Eng.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mehmet-temel-aygun-1066a514/

Copyright belongs to Author.

The path to a lean, digital value stream by Space Dreamer – 9 –

The path to a lean, digital value stream

Author : Mehmet Temel Aygün

The customer-individualized project business is formative for many companies in mechanical engineering. An exemplary analysis of the throughput times of orders of a manufacturer of customer-individualized machine components shows that the largest proportion of time goes towards development and parts procurement, followed by customer contact during project clarification and in the context of delivery and commissioning. The product only spends a small portion of time (4% in the example) in production. It can be assumed that a similar time distribution can be observed in many companies in the industry.

Today, the Value Stream Method is the standard in many companies that want to improve their product flow, reduce inventory, and decrease throughput times. The method’s focus is mostly on the parts and product flow from supplier to  customer. Information flows are essentially regarded from the perspective of production control and its improvement.

The extended Value Stream Method

If the objective, however, is to satisfy individualized customer requests quickly, flexibly, and,  at the same time, efficiently, only considering production, material flows, and the associated control information falls short. For this reason, in the following, the focus of the traditional Value Stream Method will be extended to all areas involved in order processing, including the customer. Furthermore, the information within the scope of this method will be considered from three new perspectives:

  • Waste in handling information
  • Use of information for process improvement
  • Use of information to increase customer value

A look at waste in handling information

Lean activities typically aim for eliminating transport, inventory, movement, waiting time, overproduction, over-fulfilling processes, and defects. These traditional types of waste provide support in the analysis of material flows and production itself, but they cannot be transferred directly to information flows. In order to holistically recognize wastes and potential in handling information, a new perspective is necessary. Following material logistics, the term information logistics is therefore introduced. For this, the goal is formulated to provide information at the right time, at the right place, in the right amount, and of the proper quality and ultimately to be used in a target-oriented manner. This should take place with as little waste as possible.

Within the scope of a Value Stream Analysis 4.0, eight types of waste in information logistics are introduced that emerge along the lifecycle of information and can be assigned to defined phases. A cycle consists of three phases:  

  • Data generation and transmission
  • Data processing and storage
  • Data usage

The individual types of waste in information logistics are clarified in the following by guiding questions. 

Phase of data generation  and data transmission

The goal during data generation and transmission is to make the desired data available in the proper quality. Wastes can occur in the:

Data selection

  • Has a purpose been designated?
  • Is clearly defined what the data will be used for?

Data quality

  • Do the frequency and level of detail of the collection fit with the intended use?
  • Has the data been collected and transmitted in a standardized manner?  

Data collection

  • Is the collection of data appropriate with regard to the costs and benefit?
  • Is the regular collection of data automated?

Data transmission

  • Does an interface-free communication of data take place?
  • Is the data stored centrally?

Phase of data processing and storage

Data and the resulting information should be processed continuously and without waiting time in order to be available for decisions or activities. Wastes can be:

Waiting times and inventory

  • Can an order not be processed because information is missing?
  • Is data and information available at exactly the right time?

Transport, movement and searching

  • Can employees find the required information without searching effort?
  • Is the presentation medium suitable?

Data usage

The data compacted into information is to be used purposefully, either for order processing, for the improvement of processes, or to increase to product’s value. product value The following wastes can arise:

Data analysis

  • Is the recorded data analyzed with appropriate methods?
  • Are these analyses used?

Decision-making support

  • Is the data verifiably used for decisions or improvement activities?
  • Is the information processed in accordance with its use? 

Value Stream Method 4.0 

Through the Value Stream Method 4.0, all product and information flows of a value stream are analyzed and designed.  It comprises the Value Stream Analysis 4.0 (VSA 4.0) and the alue Stream Design 4.0 (VSD 4.0). The approach extends across departments from the first customer contact all the way to the shipment of the product. The goal of the method is to develop all processes of a value stream in such a way that customer requests can be satisfied quickly, flexibly and thereby efficiently. The emphasis here is on the simultaneous consideration and synchronization of product and information flows.

Approach in three steps – an overview

Step A – Define added value

The starting point of the Value Stream Method 4.0 lies in obtaining a basic understanding of what generates customer value. This refines one’s awareness during the search for wastes

Step B – Analyze the current state

Within the scope of the traditional VSA, process data, inventory, and control information are recorded and so-called “Kaizen flashes” (improvement opportunities) are delineated. The scope of the VSA 4.0 is extended to the entire order-processing, begins with the first customer contact, and goes all the way until product usage. A detailed observation of the information flow follows during the order cycle. It targets wastes that emerge during the handling, transport and usage of data and information (so-called wastes in information logistics).   

Step C – Determine the future state

Only a fundamentally stable and, with regard to material flow, lean value stream should be digitally supported or digitally valorized. Therefore, the traditional VSD, with its design rules, continues to remain the first step to the digital target condition. The resulting value stream vision is improved through the targeted use of digitalization solutions in order to stabilize or expand the flow, or to eliminate process steps. The VSD 4.0 focuses on the integration of product flows and the necessary information flows as well as on elaborating a consistent implementation in  IT systems.

See you in next blog with the following topics :

  • Execution of the Value Stream Analysis 4.0

30.05.2020

Kadıköy, İstanbul – TURKEY

M. Temel AYGÜN, Ph. D. in Aerospace Eng.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mehmet-temel-aygun-1066a514/

Copyright is Author’s.

Lean & Industry 4.0 part 4 by Space Dreamer – 8

Author : M.Temel AYGUN

Takt, Flow, Pull

The customer takt is the average time that passes between the shipment of individual products of a product group. The closer and more stable process steps can follow the customer takt, the more closely they can be connected, the less unproductive waiting times occur and the better the material flows.

“Pull” means that material movements or orders are only authorized or started by a demand of internal or external customers. Within the scope of flow and pull, the customer takt synchronizes the activities of all parties involved in the value stream so that they intertwine with as little waste as possible.

Limits of Takt, Flow, Pull: If products are very different with regards to their work content and bills of material and if their demand fluctuates strongly, then determining a customer takt is very demanding or even impossible. The stronger the fluctuation of the work content within a product group, the more demanding it will be to economically organize flow lines with takt. Also, big machines and systems can only be moved between stations with great effort, which is why they are often constructed at the location. At the level of the production material, pull control according to the supermarket principle can only be economically implemented for materials that have a regular consumption and a not too high value.

Opportunities through  digitalization and Industrie 4.0

  • Opportunity 1:  Reducing cycle times through an improved flow of information: In project business, a value stream analysis should take place from the first contact with the customer all the way to the maintenance of a product. Thereby, special focus should be on idle times and waiting times due to missing information (authorizations, documents, programs, etc.). Here, the following rule applies: No order may wait due to missing information. The necessary extension of the value stream focus to production-related areas (work preparation, order planning, logistics) provides valuable new insights. Subsequently, unused information is to be eliminated and the measurement, transfer, and provision of necessary information is to be improved through digitalization.
  • Opportunity 2:  Aligning material logistics with demand: Inventory at workstations and lines can be reduced if transport orders for material are only triggered by a pull signal from the line itself (e.g. via MES). Here, the release of productions orders is to be treated separately from the authorization of the transport orders. For large assembly works the request for retrieval of the material can take place in this way in accordance with the assembly progress through appropriate terminals at the assembly site. A better levelling of the workload in logistical areas is the result.

Logistical elements like supermarkets or FIFO (First-In-First-Out) lanes can be made more flexible through digital support.For example, by dynamically adapting inventory to demand and supply patterns. eKanban helps reduce inventory by a faster transmission of information. Milk run systems (e.g. routes) can be dynamically adapted to the current demand. The drivers of a milk run train are to be shown all necessary information in order to guarantee the shortest routes and to avoid mistakes. Automated guided vehicle systems also find application here.

  • Opportunity 3:  Utilizing assembly lines in a better way: By adapting the workstations, a larger spectrum of different products can be economically assembled at the same stations. Here, the ability of products to identify themselves at workstations (so-called active traceability) proves helpful. It is conceivable that a product configures its own work instructions, triggers the picking of its individual materials, or ensures that the workstation is digitally supplied (the product controls the process) with the suitable process data (e.g. torque, NC program codes, test programs, etc.).
  • Opportunity 4:  Recognizing bottlenecks early on: Through the networked representation of the information from critical reporting points and a tracing of materials along a supply chain, bottlenecks can be recognized early on and countermeasures can be taken before serious disturbances occur.

Autonomation / Jidoka 

Autonomation / Jidoka pursues the goal of developing processes that allow only to produce good parts. This should be achieved through mistake-proof devices (Japanese: Poka Yoke) as well as through a workstation design that guarantees zero defects (so called “built-in quality”). In case of problems occurring they should be reliably recognized by machines or employees, which usually triggers a defined escalation process that can lead all the way to the stop page of production (reactive improvement cycle). It is important to ensure a short feedback loop to the location of an error, so that containment can start quickly and a problem analysis can be carried out with fresh and reliable information. This is the prerequisite for short-term protection of the customer and a sustainable problem solution.

Limits of Autonomation / Jidoka: If small quantities of different products are produced at the same workstation, often a 100% avoidance of error through devices cannot be achieved with acceptable effort. Without a clear specification of process parameters, work steps and expected work progress, the recognition of deviations is hindered. Escalation cascades (who reacts until when?) do not work safely, if they are defined at all. If a problem is nevertheless identified, measures are first taken against the effect of a problem. A systematic, causal problem solution is often omitted, so that a problem can reoccur. However, if a systematic approach is taken, problem analysis is often sloppy because associated process information is missing or can only be obtained with a great deal of effort. This leads to inadequate measures or prolongs the problem-solving process.

Opportunities through  digitalization and Industrie 4.0

  • Opportunity 1: Increasing safeguard against improper mishandling (production): Where hardware solutions are too inflexible to handle variety, improper handling and mistakes during execution can be prevented through software-based solutions. Products that identify themselves when registering for a process (e.g. at a screw or test station) can initiate the configuration of devices, tools, and work instructions specific to them. Digital worker assistance systems show work documents and steps via a monitor or data glasses. The movements of a person can be followed through ultrasound or camera systems and compared with the expected procedure in order to intervene in the event of deviations. In this way, mistake-proofing processes can finally be achieved by a softwaresupported, adaptive Poka Yoke.
  • Opportunity 2: Avoiding improper handling in information flow: In areas that are upstream or downstream of production (e.g. development, work preparation, or shipping), IT system discontinuities are to be avoided that can lead to the error-prone transmission of data and waiting times. Generally, in these areas all activities with mainly repetitive character are to be critically scrutinized.    
  • Opportunity 3: Solving problems more effectively: Through component identification and backtracking, product and process information can be comprehensively interwoven. Defective products can be better narrowed down. Also, the location of the emergence of an error can be found faster and problems can be described more fully.    
  • Opportunity 4: From reacting to preventing defects: The linking of process data with deviations allows for the training of systems. In this way, conditions in the future can be forecasted based on current process data. The residual lifespan of tools or components for instance,can be determined. In several cases, problems can be proactively recognized and solved without defects emerging. This results in a reduced rate of rejects and rework.

Continuous Improvement Process (CIP)

The reduction of non-value-adding activities forms the core of a lean system. Improvement activities are either reactively initiated through deviations from target conditions or proactively created through the provision of newer, more demanding goals. The underlying approach of improvement follows the PDCA cycle. Deviations from standards or gaps to targets initiate the PDCA cycle anew every day. Employees solve the underlying problems and ideally thereby improve both their processes and their own problem solving skills.

Limits of Continuous Improvement Process: Occurring problems may have already been solved elsewhere in the same or a similar form. Often the team lacks knowledge of these solutions which could shorten the problem solving process. If the problem complexity is underestimated and an appropriate problem analysis remains undone, then the cause-effect-chain will not be traced back to the root cause. In consequence the defined measures very likely won’t address the root cause. Such a process can only effectively solve “simple” problems. The more complex problems are, the more spread out the activities of the PDCA cycle across multiple employees and departments. This complicates the pursuit of deadlines and results on the action plan and the probability increases that the PDCA cycle is only undergone incompletely. Typically, a measure is only partially implemented (Plan & Do), the necessary success monitoring on-site remains undone (Check), and the improvement approach “peters out” with time.

Opportunities through  digitalization and Industrie 4.0

  • Opportunity 1: Transparency in the tracking of improvement measures: Software-based action plans help to more easily track the progress of individual measures and to increase transparency through the allocation of tasks amongst employees and between different departments. At the same time, they help to ensure the complete execution of a PDCA cycle.
  • Opportunity 2: Improving knowledge management: The digital documentation of successful problem solutions and their implementation can take place through databases (e.g. in the form of a Wiki system). The opportunity for a networked search for these activities can prevent the same problem or similar problems from being solved twice. 
  • Opportunity 3: Better recognizing complex connections: The process data that belongs to a deviation or a defect can be automatically integrated into a systematic problem analysis and clearly depicted. In this way, the team receives a better foundation for the subsequent search for the cause. 

The stated opportunities can, for example,  be realized through digital Shop Floor Management.

See you in next blog with the following topics :

  • The path to a lean, digital value stream
  • A look at waste in handling information
  • Value Stream Method 4.0 

24.05.2020

Kadıköy, İstanbul – TURKEY

M. Temel AYGÜN, Ph. D. in Aerospace Eng.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mehmet-temel-aygun-1066a514/

1961 İzmit İstiklal Gazetesi – Babamın Yazıları – 12 (1 Haziran 1961) – KAZIK

OLAYLARIN ARDINDAN

KAZIK

Author/Yazan: Numan Bayraktaroğlu

Bir arkadaşım anlatıyordu:

Şu İstanbul İzmit asfaltı var ya, bu yol üzerinde ve İstanbul’dan İzmite’e doğru karısı ve bir yaşında çocuğu ile otobüsle seyahat ediyormuş. Otobüsleri, Gebze’nin altındaki çınarlı benzin istasyonunda benzin ikmali yaparken, bizimkilerde hemen benzinciye bitişik ve görünüşü çok temiz olan bir lokantaya girip çocuklarına yiyecek sorarlar. Lokanta sadece içki için kurulu olduğundan çorba V.S.nin olmadığı bildirilir. Çocuk için bir şey bulamayınca, bari derler, biz bir parça bir şeyler yiyelim diye ve hakikaten oturup dört tabak yemek yerler. Hesap 7.75 lira tutmuştur.

Şimdi biz, bunların yediklerine bir göz atalım: Birer tabağı zeytinyağlı dolma. Her tabakta, kuş yumurtası kadar ve dört tane dolma var. İnsan dördünü çatalla bir lokmada yutabilir. İkinci yemekleri, birer ızgara ciğer. Bu da on porsiyon yense doyulmayacak kadar az.

Peki….Bu lokantanın diğerlerinden farkı nedir ki; başka yerde dört liraya yenecek yemekleri burada sekiz liraya yiyelim. Herhangi bir eğlencesi yok, müzik yok ve diğerlerinden farklı hiçbir şeyi yok.

Ben, bu lokantayı bilirim. Oradan her geçişimde bomboş durur ve içinde müşteriyi pek nadir anlarda görürsünüz. Hani bir fıkra vardır: Bir eşek, hızla bir lokantaya girer, ve bir sürü yemek ısmarlıyarak karnını doyurur. Garsondan hesabı ister ve öder. Ancak kendine merakla bakan garsona “Ne bakıyorsun,, deyince garson “vallahi,, der “Ben şimdiye kadar, bizim lokantaya bir eşeğin gelip yemek yediğini hiç görmedimde ondan şaşırdım.,, Bunun üzerine eşek, güler ve “Vallahi siz bu tarifeyle ikinci bir eşeğin daha burada yemek yediğini artık göremezsiniz,, der.

Bizim bahsettiğimiz gibi lokantanın durumu da aynıdır. Ancak işin asıl garibi, bunlara, bu tarifeyi verenlerde veyahut tasdik edenlerdeki zihniyettir.

1 Haziran 1961

Darıca, Kocaeli, Türkiye

Yazan : Numan Bayraktaroğlu

Digital development paths using the Toyota House as an example by Space Dreamer – 7

Author: M.Temel AYGUN

Lean production often appears as an approach that comes from the large-scale production of automobiles and from time to time reaches its limits in the project business of machine and system engineering. A high percentage of customer individuality, a low repetition frequency of activities, and extensive work contents impede the standardization of procedures and thereby prevent the basis for a sustainable introduction of lean. Especially the aspect of overcoming these limits through digital opportunities will play a role in the following chapter. For each element of the TPS the underlying mindset will be briefly introduced and where the practical implementation often reaches its limits will be shown. Subsequently, the opportunities for overcoming these limits within the context of digitalization and Industrie 4.0 will be presented.

Stable and Standardized  Processes

The stabilization and subsequent standardization of processes is the foundation for continuous improvement processes. The recognition of deviations is only possible through standards with a continuous target/actual comparison. Stability and standardization are furthermore the prerequisite for running further TPS elements, such as flow production or the triggering of PDCA cycles. Therefore, stability and standardization build the foundation of the TPS.

Limits of Stable and  Standardized Processes: Customer-specific individual products cause a high processing effort from sales to adjustment development, purchasing, and work preparation all the way to production and service. The creation of standard work instructions for individualized products and their components is time-consuming and error-prone. The processing and cycle times vary both in production and in all other areas. Frequently changing processing tasks mean that it is almost impossible to set times for workplaces and systems. But without standard specifications, deviations and underlying problems can hardly be recognized.

Opportunities through digitalization and Industry 4.0 :

  • Opportunity 1:  Extend standard work in  customer-individualized production: Analogous to the structure of the product program, related work and process standards can be modularized and digitalized. Subsequently, the work documents are adaptively configured for each of the products to be produced and digitally made available to the operator on-site. In this way, quantity and time per unit can also be specified for non-series production. These adaptive work standards, in turn, are the basis for managing deviations as a foundation of continuous improvement processes.
  • Opportunity 2:  Reducing effort in production preparation, avoiding mistakes during execution: The modularization and digitalization of work instructions means increased initial effort, but subsequently reduces work preparation effort for individual orders. Digital worker assistance systems provide the current information and thereby avoid improper processing caused by outdated paper documents. This way, paper will continue to be increasingly replaced in production by networked, electronic media. At the same time, assistance systems (e.g. pick-by technologies in commissioning) can avoid or recognize wrongful acting. Thereby, quality can be improved, order throughput time be reduced and flexibility be increased.
  • Opportunity 3:  Increasing the reliability of machines: Many companies measure the efficiency of their machinery and equipment and record the reasons for loss. Regardless, unplanned breakdowns still occur. The targeted equipping of existing systems with networked sensors can help to detect critical conditions (contamination, filling levels, wear and tear) at an early stage and to plan the maintenance or replacement of components in good time (e.g. during the next planned maintenance shift). The next predictive level of maintenance can be reached with machine learning. Through the linking of a machine’s condition data with labeled event data (dimensions, surface areas, tool breakage, etc.), connections can be found and future events predicted.

Visual Management

The visual representation of process conditions and performance as well as standard procedures and work documents provides employees and management with the opportunity to recognize deviations immediately and without additional aids and activities. A good visualization makes standards simple and easy to understand through optical elements without additional tools so that no deviation keeps consealed. The identification of deviations is in turn a trigger for continuous improvement processes.

Limits of Visual Management: Manual recording, continuous updating and subsequent visualization of key figures is time consuming and error-prone. The performance of a process is often only recorded at the end of a shift or a week. This wastes valuable response time for managers and employees.

Opportunities through digitalization and Industry 4.0

  • Opportunity 1:  Early detection of deviations –  Employee perspective: Important information about one’s own process can currently be made available to the employee directly at his or her workstation or anywhere else. In the simplest case, this is the current target/actual performance comparison (e.g. for number of units/productive time and scrap/rework time). This way, the employee can react or escalate in a timely manner. By expanding information to a simple trend analysis all the way to the prediction of deviation (realized through machine learning), the employee can engage proactively before negative effects on the process occur. Already today, for example, the failure of tools can be predicted. Depiction can take place, depending on the user, on-site via monitor, smartphone, or directly on a smart wearable (watch, glasses, etc.). This way, information can be made available directly to the respective employee.
  • Opportunity 2:  Early detection of deviations –  Management perspective: Through the digital and direct provision of actual values, trends, and prognoses, management is provided with the opportunity to intervene more quickly. The daily meetings on the shop floor can be supported by the current values of important workstations, machines and systems, which are sent via radio technology directly to a device. Escalation cascades are pushed beyond the limits of manufacturing execution systems (MES) or enterprise resource planning systems (ERP) and management can provide support early on, reallocate resources, or situationally find solutions.
  • Opportunity 3:  Solving problems more quickly with digital shop floor management: In daily shop floor meetings, above all, it is about recognizing target/actual deviations and describing these for the subsequent problem solving as comprehensively as possible. Figures, measurement results, and process data provide help and enrich the structured problem definition. Their digital measurement can bring about a temporal relief. The far greater benefit of digitalization lies in the possi bility of detecting relations between deviations (e.g. product defects) and the associated process data (such as temperatures, power consumption, feed forces, etc.). In this way, the point at which the error occurs can be narrowed down more quickly and more reliably. Utilizing documented digital PDCA cyclesenables  a networked search for similar events and thereby successful solutions.

Levelled Production

The direct transfer of fluctuatingdemand to production leads also to a fluctuating capacity utilization. This results in provision of additional capacity, unused capacity, as well as continuous plan changes, also in supply. The stronger the fluctuation of capacity, the harder it is to adhere given standards and processes, with the corresponding consequences for quality  as well as managing deviations. Therefore, through levelling and smoothing, the planning of production is decoupled from the market demand to a certain extent. This takes place, on the one hand, with a view to the overall capacity of production, in which orders are planned only until the attainment of maximum capacity. On the other hand, orders are scheduled with a smoothing pattern (“mix”) so that individual stations are not overloaded while others are simultaneously underloaded.

Limits of Levelled Production: Levelling and smoothing fluctuating demand for customer-individualized products is a challenging task. This is mainly due to the very different character of products and the associated fluctuating load of individual workstations or production areas. In this environment, master data, order data, resource data or project data are barely maintained or not available. Furthermore, available resources are unknown when decisions on the quantities and deadlines are made. Cooperation between sales, customization development and work scheduling is not synchronized, which is why customers are promised orders that cannot be realized within the specified time frame.

Opportunities through  digitalization and Industrie 4.0

  • Opportunity 1:  Making better decisions in sales: For the even planning of orders, it is already necessary in sales to estimate a new project’s capacity requirements in individual areas or at different locations and to synchronize it with the available capacity. The basis for this is on the one hand the division of the available capacity into so-called capacity buckets On the other hand, maintaining bills of material and standard times in the ERP system is needed. While this is a standard function of current ERP  systems, the great opportunity lies in making the capacity available for sales via a mobile frontend. Within a time frame (e.g. one week), only a certain amount of orders is confirmed until the associated capacity bucket has been exhausted. This way, customers can be promised more realistic delivery dates and throughput times decrease, as the inventory of already begun orders is avoided by less rescheduling.
  • Opportunity 2:  Better utilization with simpler planning: For certain product properties, a solution space can be defined that can be mapped by production without major planning and set-up effort. Configurators enable the sales department or even the end customer to find their individual solution based on rules. If the affected production system is prepared for all parameter combinations without major set-up effort, customers can book the next free deadline for their orders themselves. There is no need for the creation of engineering drawings, the writing of offers, as well as activities in work preparation.   
  • Opportunity 3:  Self-organized pull planning: In defined segments of production (e.g. final assembly), free workstations can pull the next suitable order from a reserve of released and prepared orders. This is supported by automated guided vehicle systems (AGV) which transport the preliminary product and the required material to the next free station. The goal is an efficient and even use of available capacities.

See you in next blog with the following topics :

  • Takt, Flow, Pull
  • Autonomation / Jidoka 
  • Continuous Improvement Process (CIP)

17.05.2020

Kadıköy, İstanbul – TURKEY

M. Temel AYGÜN, Ph. D. in Aerospace Eng.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mehmet-temel-aygun-1066a514/

Copyright .

1961 yılı İzmit İstiklal Gazetesi – Babamın Yazıları-11 (31.05.1961) Azami Sürat

OLAYLARIN ARDINDAN

Azami Sürat

Author/Yazan : Numan Bayraktaroğlu

Bizim Darıca’nın şehire giriş yeri ile Yalıya çıkış yerinde, trafik teşkilatınca mı yoksa Belediyece mi konulduğu bilinmeyen iki işaret tablosu vardır: Bunlarda “Azami sürat 10 Km” ibaresi yazılıdır.

Bu işaretler, vardır ama yine de Darıca’nın bu caddesinden geçen vasıtaların hemen hepsi, en azından elli Km hızla aşağıya ve yukarıya doğru seyreder. Darıca’nın, bu istasyon caddesi ise, azami beş metre genişliktedir. Cadde, Darıcanın nüfus ve iş bakımından en kesif olduğu bir kısmıdır. Bütün resmi daireleri iş yerleri, ticarethaneler, kahveler, cami ve ilkokul bu cadde üzerindedir. Her an, bir çok vatandaş, bu vasıtaların altında kalıp ezilmek tehlikesiyle karşı karşıyadır.

Bu trafiği kontrol görevi, trafikçilerin olmadığı yerlerde, Belediyelerin ve onların görevlendirdiği zabıta teşkilatının olması lazım gelir. Fakat, çok kere hayretle görülürki: Bedeliye başkanından tutunda, bu vasıtalar cehennemi süratla seyreder ve etraflarına ölüm korkuları saçarlar.

Ve….Şimdiye kadar da, bir zabıta memurunun, bir şoförü, fazla süratı yüzünden çevirdiğini de maalesef göremedik.

Biz, çocuklarımızın, işyerilerimizin canlarımızın, velhasıl bu arabaların tehdit ettiği herşeyimizin emniyette olmasını istiyor ve bunu ilgililerden bekliyoruz.

31.05.2020

Darıca, Kocaeli, Türkiye

Author/Yazan : Numan Bayraktaroğlu



1961 İzmit İstiklal Gazetesi – Babamın Yazıları-10 (6.05.1961) İHMAL

Author/Yazan: NUMAN BAYRAKTAROĞLU

OLAYLARIN ARDINDAN

İHMAL

Memleketimizde, çok kere ihmaller; sebebiyet verdikleri hadiselerin “facia”lar şeklinde tezahüründen sonra keşfedilir. Her gün, gazetelerde okursunuz:”Kontrolün ihlali yüzünden, müteahhit demiri az kullanmıştır ve bu yüzden, yapılan filan bina yıkılmıştır.” “Bozulan arabasını sağa iyice yanaştırmayan şöförün ihmali yüzünden arkadan gelen otobüs bindirmiştir, ölü ve yaralı şu kadar.” Vazifesini ihmal eden muhasebeci yüzünden milyonluk müessese iflas etmiştir. “İhmal yüzünden… ” İhmal, ihmal, ihmal…,,

Şimdi, şu son tren faciasına bakınız: Hepimizin içimiz cayır cayır yandı. Ölenlere tanrı rahmet versin, kurtulanlara geçmiş olsun. Çok büyük bir kaza idi, çok. Bu işin hissi cephesidir. Tahkikatların gazetelere akseden kısımlarından öğreniyoruz ki:

1- Hareket memurunun ihmali var. Birinden haber almadan ötekine yol vermiş.

2-Katar makinisti ile şefin ihmali var; tedbir almamışlarmış.

3-Banliyö treni makinistinin ihmali var; dikkat etmemiş.

4- Ve aziz okuyucularım, Devlet Demir Yollarının büyük ihmali var; bir ufak sadme de dahi tuzla buz olacak duruma gelmiş olan eski vagonları çalıştırıyor.

Bunlardan üçünün hakkında derhal takibata geçildiğini gazetelerde okuduk ya, dördüncünün akibetini de bekliyoruz:

6.05.1961

Darıca, Kocaeli, Türkiye

Author/Yazan : NUMAN BAYRAKTAROĞLU



1961 İzmit İstiklal Gazetesi-Babamın Yazıları 9 (28.04.1961) Hastanelerimiz..

OLAYLARIN ARDINDAN :

Author/yazan : NUMAN BAYRAKTAROĞLU

Tanrım, hiç kimseyi sıhhatından edip hastaneye muhtaç etmesin. Bu hastahaneler hele Taşranın Devlet Hastahanelerinden biri olursa vay geldi hastanın haline.

Göğüs hastalığına tutulmuş bir arkadaşım vardı. Artvin Devlet Hastahanesinin bu hastalıkla ilgili bir servisinde yatıyordu. Yattığı servise “servis” denmesi için bin şahit lazımdı. Pisti. Bakımsızdı, sinekler yığınak yapmıştı, günlerce doktor uğramıyprdu, odanın içi feci idi ve arkadaşım yürüyerek girdiği servisten, tahmin ettiğiniz gibi öldü ve öyle çıkdı.

Hastalanır ve bir hastahaneye muayene veya tedavi için giderseniz, doktorun karşısına çıkıncaya kadar, kapıcıdan ayrı, hasta bakıcıdan ayrı ve hemşireden ayrı azar yersiniz. Sanki o bakıcılar ve kapıcılar bütün şefkat hissinden yoksul kalmış ve birer azarlama robotudurlar. Hastahanelerin sağlık kısmı ile ilgili doktor ve sağlık memurları hemşireler kısmına sözümüz yoktur. Hoş; bunlardan da bazan merhametsizler çıkıyorya ama binde onu aşmadığı için yekün teşkil etmiyor ve tesirsiz kalıyor. Diğerleri, yani bakıcılar ve kapıcılar takımı, çok nursuz ve merhametsiz oluyorlar. Bunlara, Bakanlık çok az maaş vermektedir. Gerçi çok kere yiyecek, giyecek ve yatacaklarını hastahaneden temin ederler ama aldıkları para da azdır.

Yıllarca terfi etmezler. Dondurulmuş bir kadroları vardır, o kadro ile girerler onunla çıkarlar. Böyle az para verildiği için kaliteleri ve seviyeleri iyi personel bu hizmetlere yanaşmazlar. Bunun için de; doktorundan ne kadar iyi muamele görürse görsün, bir hasta, eğer kendisine ilacını veren ve suyunu getiren hasta bakıcıdan azar yerse iyi olmak şöyle dursun daha hasta olur.

Onun için: Böyle hakikaten eksantrik yerler de çalışacak personele yeteri kadar maaş vermeli ve kaliteli eleman almalıyız.

Bu yazımız tenkit olsun diye yazılmamıştır. Bir temenni olup, hastahanede yatıp çıkmış her hastadan aynı hususun şikayetini kolayca dinleyebilirsiniz.

28.04.1961

Darıca, Kocaeli, Türkiye

Yazan : Numan Bayraktaroğlu

Digital Strategy in Covid-19 Crisis p2 by Space Dreamer.

Learning at the pace of crisis

Moving boldly doesn’t mean moving thoughtlessly, however. Bold action and the ability to learn are highly interrelated. The real-time ability to learn during a crisis is in fact the one ingredient that can turbocharge your ability to scale quickly.

Find a new cadence

In situations of extreme uncertainty, leadership teams need to learn quickly what is and is not working and why. This requires identifying and learning about unknown elements as quickly as they appear. Prior to the crisis, leading companies had already been increasing the cadence of their learning as part of a quickened organizational metabolism (Exhibit 3). Companies can look to their example as they work to adapt to change more rapidly during crisis times—and beyond.



Four areas of intervention can help companies learn more quickly during the crisis and the next normal that follows.

Quicken your data reviews

Start by evaluating the frequency with which you review the available data. You should be reviewing multiple sources of data on a weekly (or more frequent) basis to evaluate the shifting needs of your customers and business partners—as well as your own performance. Look to your crisis nerve center as a single source of truth for newly emerging data about your employees, your customers, your channel partners, your supply chains, and the ecosystems in which your company participates. Then turn to secure file-sharing technologies like Box and Zoom to remotely share and discuss insights from this faster pace of data review.

Focus on technology

The abrupt shift to virtual operations and interactions, both inside and outside your organization, also provides an opportunity to accelerate your pace of learning about, and adoption of, technologies with which your organization might have only begun to experiment. As experimentation scales, so does learning. The rapid shift to digital can also reveal potential trouble spots with your organization’s current technology stack, giving you a sneak preview of how well your technology “endowment” is likely to perform going forward. Here are some factors to keep an eye on as you more quickly learn about and adopt new technologies:

 — Data security. Are you experiencing breaches as you move to remote working and data sharing?

 — Scalability. Where are the breaks and crashes happening as 100 percent of your interactions with customers, employees, and business partners go virtual?

 — Usability. Right now customers and business partners often have little choice but to access your products or services through your new digital offerings. Their options will expand as we move beyond the crisis. How well will your new offerings stand up? If your current usability is low, experiment to improve it now, while you still have a captive audience to partner with and learn from.

Test and learn

In normal times, experimentation might sometimes seem a risky game. Changing the working models to which employees, customers, or business partners are accustomed can seem to risk pushing them away, even when those experiments take aim at longer-term gains for all concerned. The COVID-19 crisis, however, has made experimentation both a necessity and an expectation.

Start with the customer-facing initiatives that, while more complex, offer a larger upside. Use automation and predictive analytics to quickly and effectively isolate difficulties. Look for opportunities to standardize what you’re learning to support scaling digital solutions across core business processes. Standardization can help accelerate projects by reducing confusion and creating common tools that broad groups of people can use.

Learning while scaling

As companies increase their rate of metabolic learning, they need to quickly translate what they’re learning into at-scale responses. Scaling what you learn is always an obstacle in a digital transformation. We’ve had plenty to say regarding scaling up analytics, scaling up quality, or innovating at speed and scale. Here we’ll simply highlight the role learning plays in your ability to scale your  digital initiatives.

While companies frequently pilot new digital initiatives with the intention of learning from them before they roll out broadly, these experiments and pilots, in normal times, only test one dimension at a time, like the conversion/engagement/satisfaction rates of individual customers, the unit economics of a single transaction, or the user experience of a given digital solution. Whether they want to or not, companies in crisis mode find themselves in a different type of pilot: one of digital programs at massive scale. The rapid transition to full scale in many types of digital operations and interfaces has brought with it many challenges (for example, building and delivering laptops in under two weeks to all employees to enable 100 percent of them for remote working versus the 10 percent that were previously remote). But it also brings opportunities. At the broadest level, these include the prospect for real-time learning about where value is going in your markets and industry, the chance to learn and feed back quickly what’s working in your operations and your agile organizational approach, and the opportunity to learn where it is you’re more or less able to move quickly—which can help inform where you might need to buy a business rather than build one.

Observing interaction effects

Since scaling quickly requires changing multiple parts of a business model or customer journey simultaneously, now is a valuable time to observe the interaction effects among multiple variables (Interaction effects occur when two or more independent variables interact with at least one dependent variable. The effect of all the    interactions together is often either substantially greater (or lesser) than the sum of the parts).  For example, healthcare providers are facing an increased demand for services (including mental health and other non-COVID-19 presentations) at the same time that their traditional channels are restricted, all in the context of strict privacy laws. This has caused many providers to rapidly test and adopt telehealth protocols that were often nonexistent in many medical offices before, and to navigate privacy compliance as well as patient receptivity to engaging in these new channels. Providers are learning which types of conditions and patient segments they can treat remotely, at the same time that they’re widely deploying new apps (such as Yale Medicine’s MyChart) to accelerate the digital medical treatment of their patients.

Similarly, when a retailer rolls out, within a week, a new app for country-wide, same-day delivery, it’s testing far more than one variability at a time, such as the customer take-up of that new channel. Because of the scale, it can learn about differences in adoption and profitability by region and store format. It can test whether its technology partners can scale across 1,000 stores. It can test whether its supplier base can adapt distribution to handle the new model. Shifting multiple variables simultaneously, however, also increases the degree of difficulty when it comes to interpreting the results—because you’re no longer isolating one variable at a time. Companies who have already invested in AI capabilities will find themselves significantly advantaged. Making further investments now—even if you’ve yet to get going— with continue to pay out postcrisis as well.

Simplify and focus

Given the degree of complexity created by scaled experimentation, organizations need to find ways to simplify and focus to avoid being overwhelmed. Some of that is done for them as the crisis closes many physical channels of distribution and makes others impossible to access. But further streamlining is required along the lines of what is working, what isn’t, and why. This is perhaps the first global crisis in which companies are in the position to collect and evaluate real-time data about their customers and what they are doing (or trying to do) during this time of forced virtualization. Pruning activities and offerings that are no longer viable while aggressively fixing issues that arise with your offerings will help increase the chance of keeping a higher share of customers in your lower-cost, digital channels once the crisis passes.

Don’t go it alone

Research indicates that people and organizations learn more quickly as a result of network effects. The more people or organizations that you add to a common solution space, in other words, the more quickly learning occurs—and the faster performance improves. Some argue that these network effects occur in a so-called collaboration curve.

At a time of crisis, changing needs drive rapid shifts in employee mindsets and behaviors that play out as a greater willingness to try new things. Consider how you can best support the ways your talented employees learn. One option is to build or tap into platform-based talent markets that help organizations reallocate their labor resources quickly when priorities and directions shift—and help talented employees increase their rate of learning. Be sure to look not just within the boundaries of your own company but across enterprises to include your channel partners, your vendors, and your suppliers. Chances are they will be more willing than ever to collaborate and share data and learnings to better ensure everyone’s collective survival.

It’s often the case in human affairs that the greatest lessons emerge from the most devastating times of crises. We believe that companies that can simultaneously attend to and rise above the critical and day-to-day demands of their crisis response can gain unique insights to both inform their response and help ensure that their digital future is more robust coming out of COVID-19 than it was coming in.

10.05.2020

Kadıköy, İstanbul – TURKEY

M. Temel AYGÜN, Ph. D. in Aerospace Eng

.https://www.linkedin.com/in/mehmet-temel-aygün-1066a514/

Digital strategy in a time of crisis by Space Dreamer (episode 5)

04.05.2020

Author: M.Temel Aygün

Now is the time for bold learning at scale.

If the pace of the pre-coronavirus world was already fast, the luxury of time now seems to have disappeared completely. Businesses that once mapped digital strategy in one- to three-year phases must now scale their initiatives in a matter of days or weeks.

In one European survey, about 70 percent of executives from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland said the pandemic is likely to accelerate the pace of their digital transformation. The quickening is evident already across sectors and geographies. Consider how Asian banks have swiftly migrated physical channels online. How healthcare providers have moved rapidly into telehealth, insurers into self-service claims assessment, and retailers into contactless shopping and delivery.

The COVID-19 crisis seemingly provides a sudden glimpse into a future world, one in which digital has become central to every interaction, forcing both organizations and individuals further up the adoption curve almost overnight. A world in which digital channels become the primary (and, in some cases, sole) customer-engagement model, and automated processes become a primary driver of productivity—and the basis of flexible, transparent, and stable supply chains. A world in which agile ways of working are a prerequisite to meeting seemingly daily changes to customer behavior.

If a silver lining can be found, it might be in the falling barriers to improvisation and experimentation that have emerged among customers, markets, regulators, and organizations. In this unique moment, companies can learn and progress more quickly than ever before. The ways they learn from and adjust to today’s crisis will deeply influence their performance in tomorrow’s changed world, providing the opportunity to retain greater agility as well as closer ties with customers, employees, and suppliers. Those that are successfully able to make gains “stick” will likely be more successful during recovery and beyond.

Now is the time to reassess digital initiatives— those that provide near-term help to employees, customers, and the broad set of stakeholders to which businesses are increasingly responsible and those that position you for a postcrisis world. In this world, some things will snap back to previous form, while others will be forever changed. Playing it safe now, understandable as it might feel to do so, is often the worst option.

A crisis demands boldness and learning

Every company knows how to pilot new digital initiatives in “normal” times, but very few do so at the scale and speed suddenly required by the COVID-19 crisis. That’s because in normal times, the customer and market penalties for widespread “test and learn” can seem too high, and the organizational obstacles too steep. Shareholders of public companies demand immediate returns. Finance departments keep tight hold of the funds needed to move new initiatives forward quickly. Customers are often slow to adjust to new ways of doing things, with traditional adoption curves reflecting this inherent inertia. And organizational culture, with its deeply grooved silos, hinders agility and collaboration. As a result, companies often experiment at a pace that fails to match the rate of change around them, slowing their ability to learn fast enough to keep up. Additionally, they rarely embrace the bold action needed to move quickly from piloting initiatives to scaling the successful ones, even though McKinsey research shows bold moves to adopt digital technologies early and at scale, combined with a heavy allocation of resources against digital initiatives and M&A, correlate highly with value creation (Exhibit 1).

As the COVID-19 crisis forces your customers, employees, and supply chains into digital channels and new ways of working, now is the time to ask yourself: What are the bold digital actions we’ve hesitated to pursue in the past, even as we’ve known they would eventually be required? Strange as it may seem, right now, in a moment of crisis, is precisely the time to boldly advance your digital agenda.

A mandate to be bold

What does it mean to act boldly? We suggest four areas of focus, each of which goes beyond applying “digital lipstick” and toward innovating entirely new digital offerings, deploying design thinking and technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) at scale across your business, and doing all of this “at pace” through acquisitions (Exhibit 2).

New offerings

By now you’ve likely built the minimally viable nerve center you need to coordinate your crisis response. This nerve center provides a natural gathering point for crucial strategic information, helping you stay close to the quickly evolving needs of core customer segments, and the ways in which competitors and markets are moving to meet them. Mapping these changes helps address immediate risks, to be sure, but it also affords looking forward in time at bigger issues and opportunities—those that could drive significant disruption as the crisis continues. Just as digital platforms have disrupted value pools and value chains in the past, the COVID-19 crisis will set similar “ecosystem”-level changes in motion, not just changes in economics but new ways of serving customers and working with suppliers across traditional industry boundaries.

In the immediate term, for example, most organizations are looking for virtual replacements for their previously physical offerings, or at least new ways of making them accessible with minimal physical contact. The new offerings that result can often involve new partnerships or the need to access new platforms and digital marketplaces in which your company has yet to participate. As you engage with new partners and platforms, look for opportunities to move beyond your organization’s comfort zones, while getting visibility into the places you can confidently invest valuable time, people, and funds to their best effect. Design thinking, which involves using systemic reasoning and intuition to address complex problems and explore ideal future states, will be crucial. A design-centric approach focuses first and foremost on end users or customers. But it also helps make real-time sense of how suppliers, channel partners, and competitors are responding to the crisis, and how the ecosystem that includes them all is evolving for the next normal emerging after the immediate crisis fades.

Reinvent your business model at its core

Going beyond comfort zones requires taking an end-to-end view of your business and operating models. Even though your resources are necessarily limited, the experience of leading companies suggests that focusing on areas that touch more of the core of your business will give you the best chance of success, in both the near and the longer term, than will making minor improvements to noncore areas. Organizations that make minor changes to the edges of their business model nearly always fall short of their goals. Tinkering leads to returns on investment below the cost of capital and to changes (and learning) that are too small to match the external pace of disruption. In particular, organizations rapidly adopting AI tools and algorithms, as well as design thinking, and using those to redefine their business at scale have been outperforming their peers. This will be increasingly true as companies deal with large amounts of data in a rapidly evolving landscape and look to make rapid, accurate course corrections compared with their peers.

While the outcomes will vary significantly by industry, a few common themes are emerging across sectors that suggest “next normal”  changes to cost structures and operating  models going forward.

 — Supply-chain transparency and flexibility. Neardaily news stories relate how retailers around the globe are experiencing stock-outs during the crisis, such as toilet-paper shortages in the United States. It’s also clear that retailers with full supply-chain transparency prior to the crisis— as well as algorithms to detect purchase-pattern changes—have done a better job navigating during the crisis. Other sectors, many of which are experiencing their own supply-chain difficulties during the crisis, can learn from their retail counterparts to build the transparency and flexibility needed to avoid (or at least mitigate ) supply-chain disruption in the future.

 — Data security. Security has also been in the news, whether it’s the security of people themselves or that of goods and data. Zoom managed to successfully navigate the rapid scaling of its usage volume, but it also ran into security gaps that needed immediate address. Many organizations are experiencing similar, painful lessons during this time of crisis.

 — Remote workforces and automation. Another common theme emerging is the widely held desire to build on the flexibility and diversity brought through remote working. Learning how to maintain productivity—even as we return to office buildings after the lockdown ends, and even as companies continue to automate activities—will be critical to capturing the most value from this real-world experiment that is occurring. In retail, for example, there has been  widespread use of in-store robots to take over more transactional tasks like checking inventory in store aisles and remote order fulfillment. These investments won’t be undone postcrisis, and those that have done so will find themselves in advantaged cost structure during the recovery.

Boldly evolve your business portfolio

No company can accelerate the delivery of all its strategic imperatives without looking to mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to speed them along. This is particularly true with digital strategy, where M&A can help companies gain talent and build capabilities, even as it offers access to new products, services, and solutions, and to new market and customer segments.

More broadly, we know from research into economic downturns that companies that invest when valuations are low outperform those that do not. These companies divested underperforming businesses  10 percent faster than their peers early on in a crisis (or sometimes in anticipation of a crisis) and then shifted gears into M&A at the first sign of recovery.

In more normal times, one of the main challenges companies face in their digital transformations is the need to acquire digital talent and capabilities through acquisitions of tech companies that are typically valued at multiples that capital markets might view as dilutive to the acquirer. The current downturn could remove this critical roadblock, especially with companies temporarily free from the tyranny of quarterly earnings expectations. Because valuations are down, the crisis and its immediate aftermath may prove an opportune time to pick up assets that were previously out of reach. We are already seeing many private-equity firms actively looking to deploy large swaths of capital. 

See you in next blog with the following topics :

  • Learning at the pace of crisis

03.05.2020

Kadıköy, İstanbul – TURKEY

M. Temel AYGÜN, Ph. D. in Aerospace Eng.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mehmet-temel-aygün-1066a514/

Copyright:https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-strategy-in-a-time-of-crisis